Committee Weighs Pros, Cons of Regulated mHealth App Industry

April 10, 2013
Members of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology openly weighed the pros and cons of having the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulate and tax mobile health (mHealth)-based applications. The committee, which is chaired by Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), said it was necessary to regulate for patient safety purposes, but warned that over-regulation of wireless mHealth could thwart innovation.

Members of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology openly weighed the pros and cons of having the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulate and tax mobile health (mHealth)-based applications. The committee, which is chaired by Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR), said it was necessary to regulate for patient safety purposes, but warned that over-regulation of wireless mHealth could thwart innovation.

Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) said the medical device tax, which is a component of the Affordable Care Act, when applied to the wireless world could “prove disastrous and grind this innovation cycle to a halt.”

“We all want to ensure patient safety, but why would we treat mobile applications the same as a dialysis machine? Wireless has and can continue to bring the mobile revolution to our nation’s health and wellness sector. But we must ensure that as we bring the innovation of the wireless economy to health and wellness that we not place unnecessary hurdles in the way of the developers and investors that are fueling mHealth,” Walden said during the meeting.

Representatives from the mobile app community expressed concern over the FDA not finalizing the rule that they say could apply to apps, smartphones, and tablets. They couldn’t rule out the tax could hamper innovation from their end and talked about how the “overbroad application of the arduous medical device approval process” would hurt the mHealth app marketplace. They also said over-regulation would be a deterrent to investment.

“These types of taxes, if they are applied to mobile medical applications and devices, will stifle innovation, will tempt entrepreneurs to pursue as you suggested other types of innovation, and apply their genius and their efforts to other parts of the mobile ecosystem rather than efforts to make our children, our families, our parents, healthier. So there is an impact, and we need to be very, very vigilant and cautious about going down this path,” said Jonathan Spalter, Chairman of Mobile Future, a non-profit mobile advocate group.

Video of part of the hearing. More can be seen here.

Sponsored Recommendations

TEST: Ask the Expert: Is Your Patients' Understanding Putting You at Risk?

Effective health literacy in healthcare is essential for ensuring informed consent, reducing medical malpractice risks, and enhancing patient-provider communication. Unfortunately...

From Strategy to Action: The Power of Enterprise Value-Based Care

Ever wonder why your meticulously planned value-based care model hasn't moved beyond the concept stage? You're not alone! Transition from theory to practice with enterprise value...

State of the Market: Transforming Healthcare; Strategies for Building a Resilient and Adaptive Workforce

The U.S. healthcare system is facing critical challenges, including workforce shortages, high turnover, and regulatory pressures. This guide highlights the vital role of technology...

How AI-Native Locating Intelligence Revolutionizes the RTLS market

Discover how leveraging an RTLS solution with artificial intelligence as the location engine can increase efficiency, improve safety, and elevate care without the compromises ...