Researchers: Computer-Assisted Dermatology Tool Can Improve Diagnostic Accuracy

April 22, 2015
Researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania found that a computer-assisted tool can improve diagnostic accuracy in assessing skin conditions.

Researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania found that a computer-assisted tool can improve diagnostic accuracy in assessing skin conditions.

The tool, VisualDx, allows allowing physicians to enter information such as the type and location of a rash, and associated symptoms such as pain or itching, and then generates a range of possible diagnoses accompanied by photographs. The photos allow the users to compare the rash of the patient with of more than 1,300 pediatric and adult skin conditions represented by nearly 30,000 images. The researchers say it could help providers overcome cognitive shortcomings such as availability bias, when they diagnose patients with conditions they've recently seen or can easily recall, rather than those conditions that are most likely to occur.

The researchers compared the 12 months before VisualDx was introduced to the 18 months it was use and found there was no change in the rate of dermatologic consultations at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. “This is important because these tools by design suggest numerous potential diagnoses, which could result in an increase in unnecessary testing and specialty consultation, and associated costs and harms, particularly in the hands of less experienced clinicians," the study's senior author, Craig A. Umscheid, M.D. assistant professor of Medicine and Epidemiology and director of the Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based Practice, said in a statement.

Dr. Umscheid said that a drop in consultations would have suggested that general internists, emergency room physicians, family doctors, and pediatricians may have relied on the tool to make dermatologic diagnoses, rather than consulting a dermatologist for help.

Providers accessed the applications through mobile devices (35 percent), inpatient (34 percent), outpatient (11 percent), and emergency department (one percent) electronic health records, and via searches in UpToDate, a point-of-care evidence summary resource (19 percent).

Sponsored Recommendations

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?