RSNA and KLAS: Radiologists Interested in Meaningful Use

June 24, 2013
On Nov. 27, the official opening day of RSNA 2012, the radiology-focused annual conference of the Oak Brook, Ill.-based Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), RSNA and the Orem, Ut.-based KLAS Research released the results of a collaborative survey of radiologists around meaningful use issues.

On Nov. 27, the official opening day of RSNA 2012, the radiology-focused annual conference of the Oak Brook, Ill.-based Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), RSNA and the Orem, Ut.-based KLAS Research released the results of a collaborative survey of radiologists around meaningful use issues.

The RSNA-KLAS survey of 216 radiologists found that, while 60 percent of those physicians either plan to or are considering participating in meaningful use fully, 40 percent are concerned either about the lack of clarity in meaningful use guidelines or about decreased efficiency as a result of adopting current MU guidelines.

Given the confusion that has prevailed among physicians generally regarding meaningful use, it’s not surprising that only 6 percent of those surveyed considered themselves to be educated regarding MU.

As a result, Emily Crane, KLAS research director and author of the report, entitled “Radiologists’ Take on Meaningful Use: A KLAS-RSNA Report,” said in a statement issued with the report’s release, “These numbers should be a wake-up call for the radiology industry. Most radiologists are eligible providers,” she noted in that statement, “meaning that if they meet MU criteria by the deadline, they are eligible for some or all of the $44,000 incentive. In addition,” she pointed out, “those who do not meet the criteria by 2015 will be hit with penalties. Getting educated and involved with meaningful use can’t wait.”

Among those surveyed, survey respondents said they felt that radiation dose-tracking and patient engagement were the least beneficial criteria for them, while in follow-up interviews, radiologists indicated that while they feel patients have a right to their images and reports, there was no apparent medical benefit or necessity for them to have electronic access to those images and reports.

Sponsored Recommendations

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?