The Anti-RFP Approach

Jan. 3, 2012
I have been blogging lately about RFIs, RFPs, and in general what to consider when choosing an EHR for your organization. I recently spoke to Sentara Healthcare’s Senior Vice President and CIO Bert Reese on how his organization recently won the HIMSS Davies Award, and he told me his organization didn’t even do an RFP when making their vendor selection. What Sentara took was an extraordinarily innovative approach to choosing the absolute best EHR for their non-profit hospital system, which is located in southeastern Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.

I have been blogging lately about RFIs, RFPs, and in general what to consider when choosing an EHR for your organization. I recently spoke to Sentara Healthcare’s Senior Vice President and CIO Bert Reese on how his organization recently won the HIMSS Davies Award, and he told me his organization didn’t even do an RFP when making their vendor selection. What Sentara took was an extraordinarily innovative approach to choosing the absolute best EHR for their non-profit hospital system, which is located in southeastern Virginia and northeastern North Carolina.

The finalists came down to Cerner and Epic, and Reese decided to have his clinicians create a clinical scenario for the two vendors to demo. The scenario was quite complex: the fictional patient started off in the ED, then was admitted to med/surg, then to ICU, afterwards the OR; then the patient went home and had homecare, then went to their PCP, then went back to the ED. Reese invited clinicians to watch the live EHR demonstrations of the scripted clinical scenarios. Since Sentara is a nine-hospital system, naturally not all the physicians could see the demos live, so they were videotaped. Both scenarios were put side-by-side, so clinicians could easily compare the patient’s record in both environments. DVDs were pressed and shipped to all hospitals and practice groups for comments. By the time the final vendor was recommended to senior management, 3,000 people, of which 1,000 were physicians, had viewed the live demo or seen the DVD. As Reese describes it, Sentara “had to create an environment where [clinicians] could actually live in the future as we were starting to build it around them.”

To find out which vendor Sentara ended up picking and how Reese accomplished implementation, stay tuned to the December issue of Healthcare Informatics, where I profile Davies winners Sentara, Miramont Family Medicine, and Nemours.

I’m curious if anyone else out there has tried an anti-RFP approach to vendor selection. What was your specific method, and how did it work out? Please share your story in a comment below.

Sponsored Recommendations

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?