Hospital M&A Doesn’t Enhance Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Study Finds

Jan. 3, 2020

Hospital acquisitions have become commonplace in recent years, but a new study has found that these types of mergers are associated with modestly worse patient experiences and no significant changes in readmission or mortality rates.

Researchers, who recently published the study in The New England Journal of Medicine, noted that the hospital industry has consolidated substantially during the past two decades and at an accelerated pace since 2010.

Multiple studies have shown that hospital mergers have led to higher prices for commercially insured patients, but research about effects on quality of care is limited, they stated.

Using Medicare claims and CMS’ Hospital Compare data from 2007 through 2016 on performance on four measures of quality of care (clinical-process measures, patient-experience measures, mortality, and the rate of readmission after discharge) and data on hospital mergers and acquisitions occurring from 2009 through 2013, the researchers conducted difference-in-differences analyses comparing changes in the performance of acquired hospitals from the time before acquisition to the time after acquisition with concurrent changes for control hospitals that did not have a change in ownership. All the hospitals had at least 25 beds and had admitted at least 100 fee-for-service Medicare patients per year.

The sample ultimately included 246 acquired hospitals and 1,986 control hospitals. The key findings were that acquired hospitals witnessed a patient experience that was moderately worse, on average; patient experience satisfaction score decline from the equivalent of 50th percentile to 41st. Further, 30-day mortality and readmission rates stayed largely the same at such facilities.

The one enhancement found was that acquired hospitals had a significant differential improvement in performance on clinical process measures, but as the researchers stated, this could not be attributed conclusively to a change in ownership because differential improvement occurred before acquisition.

A separate study last year from Rice University that analyzed 29 quality measures reported to the Hospital Compare database from 2008 to 2015 also tested whether vertical integration between hospitals and physicians or increases in hospital market concentration influence patient outcomes. The results revealed that M&A “has a limited effect on a small subset of quality measures. Yet increased market concentration is strongly associated with reduced quality across all 10 patient satisfaction measures.”

Sponsored Recommendations

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?