CDC banned from using 7 words, including “science-based,” in budget documents

Dec. 18, 2017

The Trump administration has reportedly banned officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from using these seven words in budget documents:

  • evidence-based
  • science-based
  • vulnerable
  • entitlement
  • diversity
  • transgender
  • fetus

According to the Washington Post’s Lena Sun and Juliet Eilperin, who broke the story Dec. 15, CDC policy analysts at headquarters in Atlanta were briefed about the banned words at a Dec. 14 meeting with officials who oversee CDC’s budget.

The meeting was led by Alison Kelly, a senior leader in the agency’s Office of Financial Services, who told attendees that she was just relaying the directive, the Post reported, and that the words were supposed to be scrubbed from documents that are being prepared for the president’s budget for 2019—or else they’d be sent back to the agency for correction.

“In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases,” the Post reported. “Instead of ‘science-based’ or ­’evidence-based,’ the suggested phrase is ‘CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,’ the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.”

Many members of the public health community were dumbstruck by the news. Public health scholar and author Laurie Garrett noted that the decision could hinder CDC officials’ ability to communicate to decision-makers about the science they’re doing.

It could also affect the agency’s work on sexually transmitted diseases among vulnerable populations, such as transgender people, if it can’t use the best language to describe these issues.

The latest news is part of a broader push by the administration to take scientific language in a more ideological direction and, in some cases, embrace the language of the religious right.

The administration has also been removing the phrase “climate change” from some government websites, part of its rejection of the science of global warming.

Perhaps most distressing to the science community was the news that even the words “science” and “evidence” are now being frowned upon.

“Here’s a word that’s still allowed: ridiculous,” Rush Holt, chief executive officer, American Association for the Advancement of Science, said in a statement.

Vox has the full story