Study: Despite Wide Adoption, Little Data Exists on eICUs

While nearly 10 percent of U.S. hospital intensive care unit (ICU) beds use eICUs, there has never been a systematic evaluation of how it affects
June 24, 2011

While nearly 10 percent of U.S. hospital intensive care unit (ICU) beds use eICUs, there has never been a systematic evaluation of how it affects quality and costs, according to a study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC, Washington, D.C.)

Other key study findings are as follows:

  • Hospitals adopting eICUs generally were motivated by potential to improve clinical quality and patient safety rather than expectations of cost savings
  • Among hospitals not adopting eICUs, there was agreement that the limited potential benefits did not justify significant upfront and ongoing operating costs
  • Despite the lack of specific payment or other incentives, most hospitals in the study — both with and without eICUs — were working to improve ICU performance
  • In all but one of the five eICU hospitals, poor interoperability between the eICU software and the hospitals’ enterprise-wide information technology systems created barriers to using the full extent of eICU’s advanced monitoring and outcome analysis features.

The Center for Studying Health System Change is a nonpartisan policy research organization committed to providing timely research on the nation’s changing health system to help inform policy makers and contribute to better health care policy.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates