ONC Names Patient Matching Algorithm Challenge Winners

Nov. 8, 2017
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) today announced the winners of the federal agency’s Patient Matching Algorithm Challenge.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) today announced the winners of the federal agency’s Patient Matching Algorithm Challenge.

Announced on May 1, the challenge aimed to bring about greater transparency and data on the performance of existing patient matching algorithms, spur the adoption of performance metrics for patient data matching algorithm vendors, and positively impact other aspects of patient matching such as deduplication and linking to clinical data, according to federal officials.

Patient matching in health IT describes the techniques used to identify and match the data about patients held by one healthcare provider with the data about the same patients held either within the same system or by another system (or many other systems). The inability to successfully match patients to any and all of their data records can impeded interoperability resulting in patient safety risks and decreased provider efficiency, ONC officials noted.

As such, ONC selected the winning submissions from over 140 competing teams and almost 7,000 submissions using an ONC-provided dataset. The winners include:

Best “F-score” (a measure of accuracy that factors in both precision and recall):

  • First Place ($25,000): Vynca
  • Second Place ($20,000): PICSURE
  • Third Place ($15,000): Information Softworks

---Best First Run ($5,000): Information Softworks

---Best Recall ($5,000): PICSURE

---Best Precision ($5,000): PICSURE

Each winner employed widely different methods, explained ONC officials. PICSURE used an algorithm based on the Fellegi-Sunter (1969) method for probabilistic record matching and performed a significant amount of manual review. Vynca used a stacked model that combined the predictions of eight different models. They reported that they manually reviewed less than .01 percent of the records. Although Information Softworks also used a Fellegi-Sunter-based enterprise master patient index (EMPI) system with some additional tuning, they also reported extremely limited manual review, per ONC’s announcement.

“Many experts across the healthcare system have long identified the ability to match patients efficiently, accurately, and to scale as a critical interoperability need for the nation’s growing health IT infrastructure.  This challenge was an important step towards better understanding the current landscape,” said Don Rucker, M.D., National Coordinator for Health IT. 

The dataset and scoring platform used in the challenge will remain available for students, researchers, or anyone else interested in additional analysis and algorithm development.

Sponsored Recommendations

10 Reasons to Run Epic on Pure

Gain efficiency & add productivity to your Epic data center. Download now to learn more!

Payer Platform Services and Support

Let’s leverage Payer Platform for smooth, seamless operations.When tasks are important and need to be done right, you trust the experts. The same is true for your...

Pure Powers Progressive Payers

Increase your business agility with Pure’s digital payer platform.Legacy storage solutions cannot keep up with the ever-expanding initiatives in the payer market. To deploy...

Executive Handbook: Ten Transformative Trends 2024

The editors of Healthcare Innovation have published their annual Ten Transformative Trends ensemble of articles