MU Work Group to Make Initial Stage 3 Recommendations in August

June 17, 2013
Stage 3 of meaningful use may seem a long way off. After all, the Stage 2 final rule has yet to be released. Yet for members of the Meaningful Use Work Group of the federal Health IT Policy Committee, deadlines are fast approaching. They are working to make initial Stage 3 recommendations by Aug. 1, so that a Request for Comment can by issued in November and final recommendations can be published by May 2013.

Stage 3 of meaningful use may seem a long way off. After all, the Stage 2 final rule has yet to be released. Yet for members of the Meaningful Use Work Group of the federal Health IT Policy Committee, deadlines are fast approaching. They are working to make initial Stage 3 recommendations by Aug. 1, so that a Request for Comment can by issued in November and final recommendations can be published by May 2013. At the July 3 meeting of the Meaningful Use Work Group, Paul Tang, M.D., the group’s chair, led committee members through discussion of several concepts the work group may propose, including improved care coordination.  Charlene Underwood, director of government and industry affairs at Siemens Medical, led a subgroup’s work on care coordination. She described the model for a platform that would move providers in the direction of a shared electronic whiteboard. “We think that by Stage 3, we need to begin to transition from a venue-specific orientation to a more patient-centric solution,” she said. Underwood described it as a fundamental step toward implementing the Affordable Care Act.  The committee is considering proposing that to meet the criteria for Stage 3 meaningful use, both hospitals and providers must implement a solution that:

  • Tracks individual care goals;
  • Records care team members, their roles, and their contact information across care settings;
  • Tracks tasks/steps and responsible party;
  • Feeds population health management;
  • Facilitates reconciliation of medications, problem lists, goals, and plan of care; and
  • Allows for input and viewing by all care team members, the patient and their caregivers. 

The potential measures would be:

  • A platform for collaborative care exists and is being used for at least 20 percent of patients.
  • Receiving care team members in a care transition access information for at least 10 percent of patients having an active collaborative care plan. 

Tang noted that this is the kind of preamble that all Stage 3 measure recommendations should have. “It offers a vision and a strategy for how Stage 3 addresses the new care delivery model,” he said. “That’s the kind of thing we want to up right up front for all Stage 3 recommendations.”

Sponsored Recommendations

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?