Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments on ACA Preventive Care Case

Jan. 15, 2025
The Braidwood Management, Inc. v. Becerra lawsuit will determine whether 151 million people will continue to have access to preventive healthcare services with no out-of-pocket costs

The Supreme Court stated that it would take up a challenge to a part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires insurance companies to cover some kinds of preventive care at no cost, Adam Liptak reported for The New York Times on January 10. “The new challenge is directed at a task force that decides which treatments are covered.”

Liptak explained that some Texas residents and two small Christian-affiliated businesses that provide health insurance to employees sued to contest how the task force had been appointed, saying it violated the Constitution. “The plaintiffs objected to the task force’s decision to cover medication preventing H.I.V. infection in some at-risk people.”

The Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas and The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans agreed that the task force had too much independence.

Andrew Twinamatsiko, Zachary Baron, and Sheela Ranganathan explained the background of the Braidwood Management, Inc. v. Becerra case in a December 23 article for Health Affairs. “The government is asking the Supreme Court to decide whether the structure of the US Preventive Services Task Force (the “Task Force”)—a group of nationally recognized experts who recommend services that virtually all private insurers must cover for free—is constitutional.” 

Healthcare Innovation’s Mark Hagland reported on January 2 that the legal dispute hinges on whether the Task Force members are “principal officers” or “inferior officers.” “The distinction matters,” Hagland explained, “because the plaintiffs’ legal argument is based on their contention that the Task Force members are “principal officers” whose appointments should have been confirmed by the U.S. Senate.”

United States of Care (USofCare) announced in a news brief on January 15 that it urges the Supreme Court to halt the efforts to eliminate free access to preventive care services. “By making people pay for care that was once free, eliminating these protections would inject uncertainty into our healthcare system and amplify the anxiety we know people already have about the cost of healthcare,” CEO and Co-Founder of USofCare, Natalie Davis, said in a statement.

Sponsored Recommendations

Improving Workplace Safety and Patient Care in Behavioral Health

In 2023, Vail Health enhanced safety in their behavioral health clinic, but the impact went beyond their expectations. Read their case study to see how prioritizing workplace ...

Transforming Hospital Capacity Through Smarter Patient Progression Strategies

Helping patients move seamlessly through every stage of their care, from admission to discharge, is critical to ensuring patient safety, improving outcomes, and optimizing capacity...

Beyond the AI Buzz: How Clinicians Can Leverage AI for Value-Based Success

Watch on-demand to explore the impact of implementing AI in primary care settings to reduce burnout and thrive in value-based care. Including practical takeaways on driving clinician...

Building the Connected Hospital: Bridging Operational Gaps Through Technology

Join industry leaders to explore how advanced technologies like RFID, AI, EMR, and ERP systems are transforming hospitals into connected ecosystems that enhance efficiency, streamline...