Senators Request Clarity on mHealth App Regulation from FDA

March 19, 2014
A group of U.S. Senators have sent a letter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner, Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. seeking further clarity and transparency on how the agency plans on regulating medical mobile health (mHealth) apps.

A group of U.S. Senators have sent a letter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner, Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D. seeking further clarity and transparency on how the agency plans on regulating medical mobile health (mHealth) apps.

Senators Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn), Mark Warner (D-Va), and Richard Burr (R-NC) sent the letter to Dr. Hamburg, asking for further clarification  for medical software application developers. Referring to the FDA's final guidance over mHealth apps, the Senators note that the agency used a risk-based approach in defining what it considers to be a mobile medical application, focused on high-risk medical software in particular. The Senators say a large number of apps could be actively regulated under this definition and more transparency is required for developers.

"While the FDA’s final guidance has provided clarity on the agency’s approach to regulation of mobile medical applications, we believe more transparency is needed to avoid stakeholder confusion over how a wider range of medical software might be appropriately regulated," the Senators wrote in the letter.

The Senators include a series of questions within the letter that it requests the FDA answer within three weeks of its receipt. Some of those questions include:

  • Compared to current FDA guidance, what impact would Congress establishing categories of medical software in legislation have on the FDA’s oversight of medical mobile applications?
  • What role, if any, can statutory definitions play to clarify any uncertainty with respect to assigning risk level to medical software?

  • How is the FDA determining what types of medical software updates, even minor updates, change the function of or add a function to the medical software and would require FDA review?

  • How has the FDA been coordinating with the Office of the National Coordinator and Federal Communications Commission to address the recent FDA Safety and Innovation Act working group’s concerns over interoperability?

The letter, in its entirety, can be read by clicking the link below.

Read the source article at Michael Bennet

Sponsored Recommendations

How AI-Native Locating Intelligence Revolutionizes the RTLS market

Discover how leveraging an RTLS solution with artificial intelligence as the location engine can increase efficiency, improve safety, and elevate care without the compromises ...

Harnessing the True Power of Cultural, Clinical and Operational Data

Optimize healthcare performance by combining clinical, operational, and cultural insights. A deeper understanding of team factors improves care and resource management.

How Digital Co-Pilots for patients help navigate care journeys to lower costs, increase profits, and improve patient outcomes

Discover how digital care journey platforms act as 'co-pilots' for patients, improving outcomes and reducing costs, while boosting profitability and patient satisfaction in this...

5 Strategies to Enhance Population Health with the ACG System

Explore five key ACG System features designed to amplify your population health program. Learn how to apply insights for targeted, effective care, improve overall health outcomes...