Consumer DNA tests are wrong 40% of the time

April 2, 2018

Just because you can conduct at-home DNA testing without the advice of a doctor doesn’t mean you should.

As people take a more proactive role in their healthcare, direct-to-consumer (DTC) kits have become increasingly popular.

Companies like 23andMe and DNA Direct make it easy to determine bloodlines and diagnose vulnerabilities to inherited diseases like breast cancer and cystic fibrosis.

But with great power comes great risk: A new study released by diagnostics company Ambry Genetics highlights the perils of these tests—false positives.

“The explosion of direct-to-consumer genetic testing over the last few years has created a ton of buzz, beyond just ancestry, health traits, and wine preferences,” Ambry genetic counselor Stephany Tandy-Connor wrote in a recent blog post.

Think of your genome as a book about you, with each gene a separate chapter (a long book, indeed); your DNA sequence is the letters that make up the words.

A clinical lab will read each word in a requested chapter, making sure large sections are not missing or duplicated. DTCs, on the other hand, use a method called SNP array, which reads only specific letters, but not the whole chapter (or even a full sentence).

“Many of these DTC labs also release raw data to the consumer,” Tandy-Connor continued. “This often leaves many individuals interested in what these findings mean and their potential impact on their healthcare management.”

Ambry’s research, published in the journal Genetics in Medicine, revealed a 40% false-positive rate, highlighting the importance of confirming DTC raw data before making any medical decisions.

The latest trend in DIY DNA looks for the BRCA gene, which increases the chance of developing breast and ovarian cancer.

23andMe is FDA-approved to report on three specific alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which together contain roughly 16,000 letters (sticking with the book analogy). Only four of those 16,000, however, are analyzed and reported by direct-to-consumer kits.

Geek.com has the full article

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...