Speeding Forward Along the CMIO Track

April 9, 2013
If anything was clear last month in Ojai, California during the AMDIS Physician Symposium, it was that CMIOs as a group are at a very significant crossroads professionally, both as individuals, and within the broader context of the evolution of the U.S. healthcare system.

If anything was clear last month in Ojai, California during the AMDIS Physician Symposium, it was that CMIOs as a group are at a very significant crossroads professionally, both as individuals, and within the broader context of the evolution of the U.S. healthcare system.

Indeed, their status as a group could be summarized in a series of paradoxes. More sought-after than ever before, they are also under more pressure than ever before to deliver on high-minded promises of clinical transformation. While sought after partly for their clinical backgrounds and for at least some level of informatics understanding and interest, their success more than ever will rely on leadership skills and the ability to negotiate complex collaborations among diverse stakeholder groups in patient care organizations. And though many are new to their jobs and roles, and most lack the teams of informaticists and robust budgets they need to accomplish everything front of them, more concrete results are being demanded of them than ever before.

A lot of these paradoxes came strongly into view in the results of the online survey conducted just before the symposium by Vi Shaffer of Gartner and Dick Gibson, M.D., Ph.D., of Providence Health Systems. On the one hand, this year, 64 percent of respondents to their survey indicated that they are currently in their first CMIO position, down from 81 percent in 2010, which means that more experienced CMIOs are moving into positions beyond their very first CMIO jobs.

Meanwhile, compensation levels and arrangements remain wildly diverse, ranging all the way from $150,000 to $500,000 among survey respondents, with most between $250-300K or $345-375K; and with 41 percent receiving straight salaries, and 49 percent eligible for some kind of bonus.

One of the most interesting trends has to do with reporting relationships. While the survey found that 47 percent of respondents currently report to CIOs in their organizations, and 29 percent report to CMOs, and while only five percent have dual reporting with CIOs and CMOs, Vi told me in an exclusive interview that it’s becoming clear that for many CMIOs who are strongly tuned into the Zeitgeist, a dual or hybrid reporting structure is becoming the way to go. In fact, she says, a few years ago, she and her colleagues were recommending that CMIOs report to CMOs; but as the complexity of the sets of tasks before them is becoming more and more apparent, the need to attach themselves to their organizations’ IT team (and its budget and human resources) is becoming equally obvious. (In fact, a small number of CMIOs have already been made coequal with their CIOs; but those informaticists are also being given the human and budgetary resources to manage their newly broader responsibilities.)

At the same time, CMIOs are finding that retaining their credibility as physicians is as important as ever. In that regard, I found the statistic of more CMIOs in their second CMIO job to be quite fascinating. The received wisdom just a couple of years ago was that the vast, vast majority of CMIOs would continue to emerge organically from their own organizations, partly because hiring outsiders for this role simply would not work. Is that logic now changing?

The hard reality is that the difficult slog towards meaningful use success is ramping up faster and faster these days, as the months tick down to the end of stage 1 and towards stages 2 and 3. And let’s face it, some patient care organizations are simply not organically creating the conditions necessary to nurture homegrown CMIOs and fellow physician informaticists at the pace that they need to. So while it might seem “alien” to hire from the outside, I think increasingly, many hospitals and health systems will have no choice but to do so, as they fall behind their scheduled goals for MU—not to mentioning ACO development, bundled payments preparation, readmissions work, development of the patient-centered medical home, and go-live on the transition to ICD-10—and find themselves needing professional CMIOs with the management and leadership skills, along with the medical practice and informatics backgrounds, that they absolutely need.

So the next year will be a fascinating one. It will be truly intriguing going into next year’s AMDIS Physician Symposium, to see how things develop in the coming months. What’s clear to me now is that, more than ever, CMIOs are both in the driver’s seat in certain ways in their organizations, as well as simultaneously in the “hot seat.” And with success being far from guaranteed, their fortune within individual organizations could turn sharply one way or the other at the speed of light.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...