KLAS: athenahealth, Epic Lead Way for Ambulatory EMR Usability

June 25, 2013
A new report from the Orem, Utah-based KLAS Research indicates that when it comes to usability for ambulatory electronic medical record (EMR) systems, athenahealth (Watertown, Mass.) and Epic Systems (Verona, Wisc.) are the industry’s cream of the crop. The report’s authors found that despite the fact they serve different client types, the two vendors rated high in usability across six different clinical areas.

A new report from the Orem, Utah-based KLAS Research indicates that when it comes to usability for ambulatory electronic medical record (EMR) systems, athenahealth (Watertown, Mass.) and Epic Systems (Verona, Wisc.) are the industry’s cream of the crop. The report’s authors found that despite the fact they serve different client types, the two vendors rated high in usability across six different clinical areas.

The report’s authors, who interviewed 163 providers to accumulate its information, found that athenahealth’s ambulatory software as a service (SaaS) solution for various sized practices had the highest rating of usability at go live and current state. The SaaS product, KLAS found, allows for less modification than some would like, but even still, the company had the highest usability in various clinical functions such as physician documentation.

Sixty-nine percent of providers rated athenahealth’s EMR as “ready-to-use” out of the gate, and 85 percent of providers said its usability was high today. “Being rated as the most usable EHR and as the best at driving provider effectiveness and efficiencies, it doesn’t get much better than that,” Jonathan Bush, athenahealth’s CEO, said in a statement.

Epic had moderate to strong usability at go live, but most were happy after the adjustment period. Epic’s system “excels at guiding providers,” the researchers found, and it’s “highly configurable and often customized.”

On the low end of the scale, McKesson had irked more than half of its clients who were unhappy with the go-live usability. Most, the report’s authors found, remained displeased with the product, citing poor code quality and weak support.  

The report mentioned how providers believe that meaningful use requirements distract vendors from developing physician friendly functionality. "The financial investment in EMR technology can be large for providers, but this investment pales in comparison to the outlay in effort providers are making to customize the products to achieve high usability,” stated report author Mark Wagner.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ask the Expert: Is Your Patients' Understanding Putting You at Risk?

Effective health literacy in healthcare is essential for ensuring informed consent, reducing medical malpractice risks, and enhancing patient-provider communication. Unfortunately...

Beyond the Silos: Transforming Coordinated Care Across Healthcare Systems

Coordinated healthcare is vital to delivering a high-quality patient experience, yet it has been difficult to systematize across all healthcare settings. Although it has largely...

The Healthcare Provider's Guide to Accelerating Clinician Onboarding

Improve clinician satisfaction and productivity to enhance patient care

ASK THE EXPERT: ServiceNow’s Erin Smithouser on what C-suite healthcare executives need to know about artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence, also known as GenAI, learns from vast amounts of existing data and large language models to help healthcare organizations improve hospital ...