Survey: Docs Frustrated with Manual Prior Authorization Processes

April 26, 2016
A survey of more than 300 physicians, clinical and administrative staff, and electronic health record (EHR) vendors conducted by Surescripts, the Arlington, Va.-based operator of a national clinical electronic network, revealed that providers are growing frustrated with manual processes around prior authorization.

A survey of more than 300 physicians, clinical and administrative staff, and electronic health record (EHR) vendors conducted by Surescripts, the Arlington, Va.-based operator of a national clinical electronic network, revealed that providers are growing frustrated with manual processes around prior authorization.

Although designed to control costs, providers have grown extremely aggravated with the process, spending five to eight hours per week handling these requests when manual processing is the only option, according to Surescripts data. As such, many EHR software systems have incorporated electronic prior authorization capabilities, but the functionality may not yet be a standard option, despite vendor acknowledgment that it can improve clinician workflow and quality of care. Providers noted three key benefits of having access to electronic prior authorization functionality: more efficient workflow, time savings, and reduced administrative burden.

What’s more, when it comes to the inefficiencies of manual prior authorization processing, the survey and other existing research indicated that 80 percent of prior authorization requests require extra work, rework or phone/fax follow ups, and 30 percent of a practice’s incoming calls are from patients looking for their prescriptions.

Indeed, manual processing of prior authorizations is archaic, and physicians and their clinical support staff recognize that making the process electronic is becoming increasingly important and necessary.  Of providers surveyed: 83 percent said that adding electronic prior authorization is a priority, while 64 percent agree or strongly agree that their EHR vendor should provide the functionality to help alleviate the pain points of prior authorization.

EHR vendors recognize the value of having an electronic prior authorization solution as well, with 88 percent citing that they are aware of the importance of this functionality to their customers. Similarly, 86 percent recognize that electronic prior authorization functionality is something that their customers expect their technology to provide in order to help them manage the process.

Regarding the impact on patients, 66 percent of physicians say that it can take two or more days, on average, for patients to get their medication when a prior authorization is involved, and 40 percent of prescriptions are abandoned at the pharmacy due to delays. These delays mean decreased medication adherence and ultimately affect care quality, both of which can be improved when prior authorizations are processed electronically, according to Surescripts.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...