New Years Resolutions - Video Conferencing and Training
I'd like to close by sharing what I've learned in 2009, and welcome your experience as well.
1. The technology works and is readily available:
- Free: one of the applications/services for computer to computer video conferencing is free, if you have a modern laptop or a desktop with a camera and microphone.
- Inexpensive-way to start: although inexpensive netbooks work great for video conferencing, the quality is typically only acceptable. Images are low resolution and motion isn’t smooth. I brought my mom into video conferencing last year for $300.
- Camera: switching from a cheap Web cam (like the internal ones in some netbooks) to a ~$100, auto-focus, 2+ megapixel Web cam makes a huge difference. Much better image, which improves the experience.
- Internet Connection:
- Remarkably, free, public access WiFi is often enough.
- We have Verizon FiOS (fiber-optic Internet service), and we're paying for an upgrade to service faster than 5 MBs.
- Dropped calls: Some calls drop frequently. Sometimes related to time-of-day. Sometimes related to distance. And often related to other concurrent network uses, such as VoIP. If you start with an expectation that you may need to reconnect every 15-20 minutes, and you may occasionally need to switch to voice, you'll likely be pleasantly surprised when video conferencing works for several hours at a time perfectly. If you expect it to be perfect quality of service, you'll be very disappointed at some point.
- Computer: running on a reasonably recent multi-core, fast computer also makes a difference (even in addition to the better camera point above). I've been able to vary camera, connection and computer, and have seen that great results can be achieved. Two days ago, for example, I was Skyping with a friend in San Diego from Washington, DC. We both had fairly optimal settings. The call quality was pretty much at a high def TV standard, in terms of picture quality and frame rate (picture smoothness with motion). It's amazing to see someone roll their eyes and smile; no words can communicate a point as efficiently and effectively.
2. Fitting video conferencing into self-management, including time management, social networking, and task management is new to everyone. I don't, for example, leave myself in an online status when I'm not using video conferencing. I don’t want the interruption. And many employees don’t want to enter using VC. See #4. As is the case with every other communication medium, like phone or email, there's a moderate amount of sophistication involved in choosing and using the right method in any context.
3. Lighting - generally, we’ve all set up our computers such that our faces are not illuminated. Using VC most effectively is improved with appropriate placement of a simple desk lamp. Also, attention to back lighting is sometimes essential. In English, draw the blinds on the window behind you.
4. Who will play, who won’t …
- Employees: who multi-task during frequent teleconference calls hate the idea of video conferencing. They want to be able to do other things and not be seen. VC is a face-to-face experience. You cannot get away with absent presence, with having your head down to the blackberry or iPhone in your lap, or the unrelated email. These employees won’t go near video conferencing because of this effective accountability.
- "Dress Code:" video conferencing is often paired with working from a home office. This location, as we all know, is associated with zero grooming and a very relaxed dress code, and has been used by some as a reason to eschew VC. That shouldn’t be the driver to preclude experimenting with video conferencing. This is a big issue for some.
5. Multi-way video conferencing is available (e.g. Apple iChat, and various Web services). This can gobble up network bandwidth and computer resources, but both are improving every year.
6. The shared desktop - It's extremely easy to switch from sharing video to all or part of your screen. This makes it possible and easy, for example, to present a Powerpoint or an application demonstration and concurrently see the reactions of the receiver. Last year at HIMSS, I was able to do private demonstrations for people who were not able to attend.
Are you using video conferencing? Where have you found that it creates value? Should you be increasing your video conferencing experimentation in 2010?