Revenue Cycle Services Delivering Big Results

Nov. 24, 2009

OREM, Utah – Nov. 24, 2009 – While the healthcare industry has turned most of its attention to clinical systems and meaningful use, the market for revenue cycle consulting services continues to grow. A new report from KLAS examines the diverse landscape of revenue cycle consultants and whether the returns are worth the investment.

 Revenue Cycle Services: From the Extended Business Office to Transformational Services highlights the performance of consulting firms offering extended business office (EBO) services, revenue cycle transformations and full revenue cycle outsourcing. Among a number of key findings in the report, KLAS noted that high-performing EBO solutions were available for every size organization. MedAssist and HRG are lauded by community and mid-sized hospital clients, Deloitte and ACS successfully service large hospitals and IDNs, and Perot’s clients spanned the spectrum – evidence that the size of a provider organization is not an obstacle to finding a successful EBO partner.

 The KLAS report also found that performance ratings for revenue cycle transformation consultants vary widely between the C-suite and the business office. C-level executives, including CEOs, CFOs and CIOs, give Deloitte and Huron Consulting superior satisfaction ratings, while ratings from business office directors are much less positive, even from within the same facility. Early indications suggest that ratings for PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) will follow a similar pattern.

 “Senior executives at healthcare organizations routinely give revenue cycle transformation consultants a significantly higher satisfaction rating than do the directors in the business office, even from within the same organization regarding the same consulting engagement,” said Mike Smith, KLAS general manager of financial and services research and author of the new report. “The C-suite hires the consulting firm, but it is the business office staff, particularly directors, who are most impacted on a daily basis for the duration of the project – and the beginning of a project can be painful as existing processes are heavily scrutinized and changed.

 “Other than being held accountable for results, the C-suite is somewhat insulated from daily operations,” Smith said.

 In the extended business office category, Perot Systems was the top-rated vendor, with a performance score of 88.3 out of 100. Other EBO firms highlighted in the KLAS report include ACS, Cymetrix, Deloitte Consulting, HRG, MedAssist, NCO, PHNS and PwC. In the revenue cycle transformation category, Deloitte Consulting took the top spot with a score of 91.4, followed by Huron Consulting (Stockamp) and PwC. Early data is also available for Accenture. In the full revenue cycle outsourcing category, only one vendor, Perot Systems, is partially rated.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...