Hospital errors in your state.com

June 24, 2011
When it comes to transparency, some believe that what’s good for Minnesota hospitals is good for New Jersey hospitals. According to the Gloucester

When it comes to transparency, some believe that what’s good for Minnesota hospitals is good for New Jersey hospitals.

According to the Gloucester County Times, there’s a bill in the N.J. Legislature would require hospitals in the state to post major medical errors online (Minnesota passed such a bill in 2003). The site would enable potential patients to compare data on different facilities regarding incidents of never events such as tools left inside patients after surgery and procedures performed on the wrong body part of person.

Yikes. I have to say that as a consumer — and one who was rather accident/injury prone in my younger days — it would be great to be able to quickly determine which hospitals have made the most errors, and avoid them if possible.

But as someone who reports on the healthcare IT industry and has been following the struggles of N.J. hospitals during the past eight or nine months, I have some doubts that this is the right approach. Like many other states, New Jersey has a number of organizations that are struggling to survive in these economic times — some of which have already had to shut their doors.

In 2008, 535 major medical errors occurred in New Jersey, resulting in 77 deaths. If every one of these infractions is published and out there to see, will that drive N.J. patients right out of the state to New York, Pennsylvania, Delaware or Connecticut hospitals?

As it stands now, N.J. hospitals are required to report never events, but it is done so confidentially according to the Patient Safety Act passed in 2005. The state releases reports about the number and types of infractions, but that information isn’t released right away, and is not categorized by hospital.

State officials say that this method allows hospitals to report the errors without risking serious damage to their reputation and lets them continue to focus on prevention. But those who support the legislation argue that it would force hospitals to improve performance and offer a higher quality of care.

It’s a tricky issue, and one that I think merits further discussion before anything happens.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...