States Look to Contract More HISP Services

June 17, 2013
Brian Ahier, a health IT evangelist for Information Systems at the Mid-Columbia Medical Center in The Dalles, Ore. participated in the recent Direct Boot Camp in Chicago put on by the Office of the National Coordinator. Boot Camp was geared toward states that are implementing the Direct Project as part of their strategic and operational plans. Many of these states had their plans approved before the Direct Project was able to provide working code. Now that it is further along, some states are putting more emphasis on using Direct for direct messaging, he notes, while more vendors are offering services based on Direct.

One of my favorite blogs to check in on regularly is Healthcare, Technology & Government 2.0 written by Brian Ahier, a health IT evangelist for Information Systems at the Mid-Columbia Medical Center in The Dalles, Ore. Besides having great insights, Brian also often shares his efforts at recording events or finding transcripts to post.

Brian participated in the recent Direct Boot Camp in Chicago put on by the Office of the National Coordinator. His description of that meeting highlights some important trends in health information exchange, and I encourage you to check it out in its entirety.

To summarize, the Boot Camp was geared toward states that are implementing the Direct Project as part of their strategic and operational plans. Many of these states had their plans approved before the Direct Project was able to provide working code. Now that it is further along, some states are putting more emphasis on using Direct for direct messaging, he notes, while more vendors are offering services based on Direct. “Therefore, many states that were originally planning to act as a Health Information Service Provider (HISP) themselves are now moving towards creating a preferred vendor list for HISPs and monitoring the market to ensure coverage for all the providers in their state,” he writes. (A HISP provides services that are required for Direct Project exchange, such as the management of trust between senders and receivers.)

For instance, at the Boot Camp, leaders of the Rhode Island Quality Institute, which is responsible for HIE in the state, said they have decided not to be a HISP. Instead, they will “pre-qualify” four to six other vendors and organizations as HISPs and focus on connecting providers to them. This change of approach may speed and simplify the exchange of documents and lab results, especially between smaller provider organizations, in the period before HIEs reach maturity (or morph into something else altogher).

Brian also provides a handy list of all the currently approved state-specific strategic and operational plans for creating health information exchange capacity.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...