HIMSS Offers Guidance on Health IT Framework

Nov. 8, 2013
The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) has written a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius offering feedback on health IT regulation, pertaining to the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) 2012.
The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) has written a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius offering feedback on health IT regulation, pertaining to the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) 2012. 
The letter starts off with a clarification that health IT products used primarily for the subsequent transmission, storage or management of data, including electronic health records (EHRs) and Clinical Decision Support (CDS) systems, do not fit the "definition of, nor would be appropriately regulated as, medical devices." 
As such, HIMSS writes, these (health IT) products should "be subject to a new risk-based oversight framework that takes into account factors such as risk relative to intended use and cost/benefit of any proposed oversight and the construct of shared responsibilities, with the intent of ensuring patient safety and appropriate improvements in quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of care delivery."
HIMSS says this oversight framework should act in concert with medical device regulation framework from the standpoint of the end-user or manufacturer. 
"We recognize that health IT and medical devices are interwoven into a single, broad patient care ecosystem, and believe that the new health IT framework can complement the existing medical device regulatory process. Our comments offer proposed elements and rationales of such an oversight framework," HIMSS writes. 
In the letter, signed by Chair of the HIMSS Board of Directors Scott MacLean and President & CEO Steve Lieber, the advocacy group mentions four areas this framework should address. This includes: 
  1. Balancing the costs and benefits of any program proposal;
  2. Ensuring clear, consistent and non-duplicative language and enforcement;
  3. Being affordable to those expected to bear direct and indirect compliance costs; and
  4. Avoiding adding burdens that inhibit or delay improvements to systems that improve care delivery and safety.

Sponsored Recommendations

A 4-step plan for denial prevention

Denial prevention is a top priority in today’s revenue cycle. It’s also one area where most organizations fall behind. The good news? The technology and tactics to prevent denials...

Healthcare Industry Predictions 2024 and Beyond

The next five years are all about mastering generative AI — is the healthcare industry ready?

Fast Tracking Caregiver Success

World-class organizations are built on world-class people. Yet in the healthcare industry, burnout is rife and the global talent shortage significantly eclipses other sectors....

Admit it, your EHR can’t do everything: Strategies for efficiency and better consumer experiences

Discover strategies to overcome EHR limitations and boost efficiency in your practice. Join industry leaders as they explore how a unified care enablement model can streamline...