New ICD-10 Legislation Calls for Coding Flexibility
Yet another bill has been introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives with the aim to institute a “safe harbor” period following the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10.
The bill, H.R. 3018, the Code-FLEX Act, calls for dual coding for six months after the ICD-10 transition deadline, which is set for Oct. 1, 2015. The legislation was introduced by Representatives Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Tom E. Price (R-NC).
Code-FLEX, if enacted, requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to report to Congress 90 days after implementation of ICD-10 on the impacts the new codes are having on providers, patients and other stakeholders. This legislation is the latest in a series of bills introduced into Congress that have called for either a transition period following ICD-10 implementation or an outright delay.
However, last week, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a joint effort with the American Medical Association (AMA) to help providers get ready for ICD-10. Part of that effort will include CMS, for the first 12 months post-transition, not denying or auditing physician or other practitioner claims solely on the specificity of the ICD-10 diagnosis code as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family
About the Author

Rajiv Leventhal
Managing Editor
Rajiv Leventhal is Managing Editor of Healthcare Innovation, covering healthcare IT leadership and strategy. Since 2012, he has been covering health IT developments for the publication's CIO and CMIO-based audience, and has taken keen interest in areas such as policy and payment, patient engagement, health information exchange, mobile health, healthcare data security, and telemedicine.
He can be followed on Twitter @RajivLeventhal