ACP Urges Legislators to Include MU Stage 2 Hardship Exemption in Spending Bill

Dec. 10, 2015
As Congress works on a year-end spending bill, the American College of Physicians (ACP) is urging the House Committee on Appropriations to include a provision for blanket hardship exemptions from Meaningful Use Stage 2 penalties.

As Congress works on a year-end spending bill, the American College of Physicians (ACP) is urging the House Committee on Appropriations to include a provision for blanket hardship exemptions from Meaningful Use Stage 2 penalties and to provide sufficient funding for public health and research initiatives.

In a letter sent to Rep. Hal Rogers, chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations, and Rep. Nita Lowey, ranking member of the committee, on Dec. 9, ACP president Wayne Riley wrote that ACP strongly supports a provision that would amend current law to provide the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with the authority to grant a blanket exemption for 2015 to physicians, hospitals and others who are affected by a penalty under the MU Stage 2 program.

Under the current rule, clinicians must attest that they have met the requirements for Stage 2 for a period of 90 consecutive days during calendar year 2015. ACP argues that CMS published the rule too late in the year —not until Oct. 16—to give clinicians sufficient time to comply.

Riley wrote, “We understand that CMS welcomes this modification to current law, and ACP applauds efforts to address the problem. ACP was also disappointed that CMS chose to re-implement the full-year reporting period to meet the Stage 2 MU requirements in 2016-2017. The College believes that 90 days is sufficient time for practices to demonstrate that they are meaningfully using their EHR system and would support a provision to return to the 90-day requirement.”

The ACP, a medical specialty organization that has 143,000 clinician members, also urged the Committee on Appropriations, as it works on year-end spending bills, or an omnibus spending-bill package, to support and make needed investments in “vital federal programs and initiatives designed to maintain and expand primary care, ensure an adequate physician workforce and promote public health.” The letter also offered ACP’s recommendations on several proposed riders that would direct how funds may be used by federal healthcare agencies.

The ACP said in the letter it opposes any provision that would significantly weaken the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ability to regulate electronic cigarettes. And, the group urged the Committee on Appropriations to support necessary and sufficient funding for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and opposed the provision that would eliminate agency funding. And, the group said it opposes proposals to eliminate needed funding for the Patient Centered Outcomes Research.

Sponsored Recommendations

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This whitepaper details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

A Comprehensive Workplace Safety Checklist

This checklist is designed for healthcare facilities focused on increasing workplace safety. It’s meant to inspire ideas, strengthen safety plans, and encourage joint commission...