mHealth Apps Need Better Review Process, Docs Argue

March 26, 2014
Two doctors at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston are advocating for the creation of a mobile health (mHealth) app review and certification organization for apps that don’t get regulated under official Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority.

Two doctors at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston are advocating for the creation of a mobile health (mHealth) app review and certification organization for apps that don’t get regulated under official Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority.

David Bates, M.D., chief quality officer at Brigham & Women’s and former Chair of the FDA’s  Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) and Adam Landman, M.D., CMIO for Health Information Innovation and Integration and an emergency medicine physician at the hospital, wrote the article for a recent issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). They argue that a good percentage of the more than 40 000 health, fitness, and medical apps available would not be regulated under the FDA, as per the agency's guidance.

“Although the FDA has focused on safety, it has largely left the review and certification of apps to the marketplace,” the physicians write in the article, saying the market reviews have focused on “personal impressions,” rather than an “evidence-based, unbiased assessments of clinical performance and data security.”

They say an organization would be desirable because the apps are typically expensive and free, and users are unlikely to care as much about their investment as an expensive electronic health record (EHR) system.  Thus, the user review, which is what KLAS does for EHRs, is not viable.

The organizations could begin by reviewing and assessing the most popular mHealth apps over a range of categories including safety, accuracy, and security. Safety could be determined through a certification process. They could also focus on the clinical effectiveness of these apps, the authors note.

“People are increasingly turning to their smartphones for assistance in improving their health, but are having difficulty determining which apps are the securest and most effective. We hope that our article will instigate action that will enable clinicians and patients to make more effective use of mHealth apps,” Powell, lead author of the article, said in a statement. “We foresee a potential future in which physicians will be able to confidently prescribe apps to their patient, and will have the tools that they need to interpret the resulting data. The establishment of an unbiased app certification and review process will play a key role in getting us there.”

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...