Improve Processes With Perioperative EHR

Sept. 24, 2009

By using electronic records, physicians no longer need to rely on nursing staff to interpret written orders or protocols appropriately.

By using electronic records, physicians no longer need to rely on nursing staff to interpret written orders or protocols appropriately.

By Christy Dempsey, BSN, Terri Budzyna, RN, and Susan Madden, MS

Prior to wide-scale computerization or the implementation of electronic health records (EHR), virtually all clinical documentation was done on paper and errors were rampant. Many times, nurses were so busy that documentation was simply not possible and had to be done later when time was available. This led to missing or erroneous information that could jeopardize patient care.

In addition, charges were not accurately captured or were erroneous. Handoffs between caregivers were often not complete and, as a result, inaccurate or incomplete documentation put the patient at risk.

Similar problems occurred in physicians’ offices. Office records contained all of a patient’s information the clinic practice had amassed during that patient’s history with the physician or clinic. Most of the time, this information was not transmitted to the hospital when the patient was admitted. In addition, during the admission process, this information was requested again by the hospital providers and held in another location. The hospital information was rarely incorporated fully into the clinic office file. This duplication of effort often led to errors and an absence of important data in one or both records.

Even when clinical documentation systems began appearing, rarely did they include the operating room (OR). The OR systems developed for this niche often did not interface with other hospital systems. This caused duplication of effort and a reliance on both paper and electronic records, further increasing the risk for errors or missing information.

Charging in the OR was done on paper and either done during the case, causing some charges to be missed, or done after the case, increasing turnover time. Difficulty remembering exactly what happened during the surgical case often resulted in missing or inaccurate information.

Poor processes and paper-based information systems also impacted patient flow through perioperative services. Finding paperwork such as histories and physicals, lab work, ECGs and medication records that were not on the chart but necessary for the procedure became a problem, leading to delays or cancellations, and increasing the potential for errors or adverse events. There was no way to tell where a patient was in the process at any given time, causing multiple phone calls to locate the patient or the family. Trying to find a bed for a patient who needed to be admitted was also a problem because there was no way to know if the bed was full, empty, available, clean or staffed without making multiple phone calls.

Records Uncover Possible Problems

An enterprisewide information system can include both physician clinic and hospital records, and will follow patients wherever their healthcare is provided. By using electronic records, physicians no longer need to rely on nursing staff to interpret written orders or protocols appropriately, improving the accuracy of the record. Orders for medications are weight-based and applications built into the record check that the order is appropriate for the patient’s weight, allergy status and age.

As the physician places the orders, the application will check for conflicts and warnings that appear if the order falls out of the specific parameters of the medication. This also provides the pharmacist with the ability to verify the order electronically rather than by fax, thus speeding up this process and eliminating many opportunities for error.

Physicians enter, “sign” and “cosign” orders from any computer with Web access. They can see their patient’s chart, review lab work and check messages for issues or information needed in the chart. They can enter notes and place orders for other physician consultations. These orders are time-stamped, and include order set defaults that enable physicians to place orders quickly by checking or unchecking what is appropriate for the patient’s condition at the time.

Improving the communication of medication orders across the continuum of patient care also reduces errors. The EHR assists with medication reconciliation by stepping through the process in the transfer and discharge navigator applications. Each time the patient’s level of care changes, these navigators are used to review home meds, current meds and orders, and discontinue or modify old orders and place new orders along with the transfer or discharge order.

Handoffs from one provider to another are no longer cursory or hampered by missing information. These handoff communications should be documented electronically and be done in a timely manner. Flow sheet rows for vital signs, intake and output, orders, labs and others are presented as links in the handoff. This allows nursing staff to call the handoff nurse while both can open the handoff report and review pertinent details.

Materials management and charge capture is handled electronically. Each procedure has an electronic list of most-commonly used items associated with that procedure so that charging is quick and easy for the nursing staff during the procedure. In addition, this information is fed electronically into the billing system, reducing duplication of effort, and improving the bills’ accuracy.

Improving Patient Flow

Patient flow within perioperative services, however, is not automatically improved by using an electronic record any more than the electronic record will make people healthier. What the record can do is provide real-time data that allows a hospital to implement and monitor strategies to improve patient flow. This EHR includes all of the necessary information for the procedure at the touch of a button.

The history and physical, lab and imaging results, medication administration records, nursing and physician notes are all available, reducing delays and cancellations related to incomplete documentation. Understanding where patients are at any given moment, what is happening to the patient during that time, and how the patient proceeds from one point in the care process to the next is key to improving the flow through the healthcare system.

The elective surgical schedule is the driver of the peaks and valleys in the inpatient census of a hospital. Addressing this controllable variability has been difficult in the past, often due to a lack of actionable data. The electronic medical record and the reporting capability that most of these systems employ allow for a greater depth and breadth of data than previously available. This data can be used in queuing analyses, simulation modeling and process-improvement strategies.

Queuing analyses allows staff to separate scheduled from unscheduled volume, reducing the waiting time for urgent and emergent patients. Simulation modeling allows the crafting of schedules that place patients in the right bed the first time, with the nurses best trained to care for that type of patient, and provides data to make sure staff have the right number of beds based on volume, acuity and strategic growth plans.

The data analysis the electronic record makes possible is the foundation to implementing sustainable, data-driven and collaborative strategies that were difficult to accomplish without the reporting capabilities the electronic record provides. The tool should be used to improve processes or processes should be improved prior to the tool’s implementation.

Patient flow within perioperative services is not automatically
improved by using an electronic record any more than
the electronic record will make people healthier.

The hard science of data analysis should be married with the soft science of change management and culture change. Simply implementing an information technology tool will not change the culture. Culture change is accomplished by using the data in a transparent way by a collaborative group of physicians and hospital leadership, fostering leadership and accountability.

For more information on
Press Ganey solutions,
www.rsleads.com/910ht-211

In her role as senior vice president of clinical operations, Christina Dempsey, BSN, MBA, CNOR, serves as project director and clinical/operational expert for Press Ganey client implementations. Terri Budzyna, RN, CNOR, is a registered nurse with 17 years experience in perioperative services. Susan Madden, MS, is responsible for Press Ganey patient flow client implementations, including managing client relations, overseeing data collection and analyses, generating reports and ensuring project success.

September 2009

Sponsored Recommendations

ASK THE EXPERT: ServiceNow’s Erin Smithouser on what C-suite healthcare executives need to know about artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence, also known as GenAI, learns from vast amounts of existing data and large language models to help healthcare organizations improve hospital ...

TEST: Ask the Expert: Is Your Patients' Understanding Putting You at Risk?

Effective health literacy in healthcare is essential for ensuring informed consent, reducing medical malpractice risks, and enhancing patient-provider communication. Unfortunately...

From Strategy to Action: The Power of Enterprise Value-Based Care

Ever wonder why your meticulously planned value-based care model hasn't moved beyond the concept stage? You're not alone! Transition from theory to practice with enterprise value...

State of the Market: Transforming Healthcare; Strategies for Building a Resilient and Adaptive Workforce

The U.S. healthcare system is facing critical challenges, including workforce shortages, high turnover, and regulatory pressures. This guide highlights the vital role of technology...