Is HHS Going Private?

June 24, 2011
Three firms are tasked with composing competing business plans for AHIC in order not to have a “last vendor standing” process.   by Kathryn

Three firms are tasked with composing competing business plans for AHIC in order not to have a “last vendor standing” process. by Kathryn Foxhall

Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Michael Leavitt has always meant for the government’s two-year old advisory body on HIT to move to the private sector as a national standard-setting organization. Now he is having that body, the American Health Information Community (AHIC), decide what a spin-off will look like. The decision could influence HIT coordination for years.

Three private firms are tasked with writing competing business plans for AHIC’s long-term survival. Leavitt wants the panel to make a final decision in July, with the transition to begin in January.

To date, AHIC’s history has been short and eventful. Three years ago, President Bush directed that the government would undertake a major push for HIT, including creation of a sub-cabinet position of a national HIT coordinator. Two years ago, HHS initiated AHIC, an advisory body to mold and speed that agenda. It was stocked with high-profile stakeholders. The current 18 members include the Blue Cross Blue Shield CEO, a Wal-Mart vice chairman, and the Intel Corporation chairman.

Leavitt also added weight to the group by personally attending and chairing at least part of many AHIC meetings, which occur about eight times a year. He stresses regularly that HIT standards must be seen moving quickly on an established path before he leaves office at this administration’s end, in January 2009, or they may bog down in the transition to a new administration.

And indeed, some historic milestones have been met, through the Office of the National Coordinator for HIT (ONCHIT) and with some key directions from AHIC. For example, national certification has begun for electronic health records and a national “harmonization” process is selecting among competing standards for communication.

But at a recent AHIC meeting, Leavitt said he wanted the well-recognized body to continue this consensus work in the private sector. According to Leavitt, it’s not best for government to arbitrarily set standards, and there are so many proprietary interests in various HIT standards, it’s not wise to wait for the market to choose through a “last vendor standing” process.

“The third way is what we are doing, which is a collaborative process that the most significant players in the market adopt and then we drive it forward. It is slower than we would like it to be. It is hard. It is a little messy. But it is the only alternative that works. And, yet, it’s not well conducted, always, by government,” said the secretary.

AHIC member Charles Kahn III, Federation of American Hospitals president, called the spin-off a great idea, but expressed concern about how funding — or lack thereof — would affect it.

Estimating the organization will need $30 to $50 million for operations, even before demonstrations and other activities, Kahn says, depending on the business model, conflict of interest concerns could arise. “Broad-based financing of some type, whatever it is, is really fundamental here, to make this work,” he says.

He warned about the “frustrating,” model of the National Quality Forum. Although it is effective and careful in its endorsements of healthcare standards and has a dues base, he says, it receives most of its funding to “consider endorsements of measures from those who want to get their measures endorsed.”

Leavitt commented that, “One of the most important aspects will be assuring is that government purchasing power is committed to the outcome of AHIC,” bringing to mind mammoth operations such as Medicare and the Department of Defense. He said that the executive order that created AHIC requires government agencies to adhere to it and that drives a lot of the change.

On the other hand, another AHIC member, Lillee Gelinas, R.N., MSN, vice president of Clinical Performance at Irving, Texas-based VHA, Inc., indicated that health IT in one of the foremost bipartisan issues in Washington and asked why AHIC should not be kept as it is, under government: “I just want to put that ugly elephant on the table.”

Kathryn Foxhall is a contributing writer based in Hyattsville, Md.

Sponsored Recommendations

A Cyber Shield for Healthcare: Exploring HHS's $1.3 Billion Security Initiative

Unlock the Future of Healthcare Cybersecurity with Erik Decker, Co-Chair of the HHS 405(d) workgroup! Don't miss this opportunity to gain invaluable knowledge from a seasoned ...

Enhancing Remote Radiology: How Zero Trust Access Revolutionizes Healthcare Connectivity

This content details how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures high performance, compliance, and scalability, overcoming the limitations of traditional VPN solutions...

Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence

Unlock the potential of AI in our latest series. Discover how AI is revolutionizing clinical decision support, improving workflow efficiency, and transforming medical documentation...

Beyond the VPN: Zero Trust Access for a Healthcare Hybrid Work Environment

This whitepaper explores how a cloud-enabled zero trust architecture ensures secure, least privileged access to applications, meeting regulatory requirements and enhancing user...