Sharing Means Caring

June 24, 2011
In October 2003, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Under Secretary for Health issued guidance to its healthcare

In October 2003, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Under Secretary for Health issued guidance to its healthcare facilities across the country on a nationwide initiative to make the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Veterans Health Information Systems & Technology Architecture (VistA) and Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) available for use by all interested state veterans homes.

The state veterans homes program is the oldest federal-state partnership in federal government and represents a sizeable commitment by VA to states for shared construction costs and ongoing per diem payments for veterans' care in long-term settings. This effort is part of the VA HealthePeople long-range strategy to pursue collaborative partnerships with other healthcare organizations in the public and private sector.

A report by the VA entitled, "VA Long-Term Care At The Crossroads: Report of the Federal Advisory Committee on the Future of VA Long-Term Care," recommended that the VA not build additional VA-owned and -operated nursing home beds to meet the growing needs for long-term care. Rather, it suggested that this need would be better met through expanding the role of state veterans homes and contract nursing homes.

Historically, state veterans homes managed a primarily medically stable population of veterans. Any change in a patient's medical condition necessitated an admission to a VA acute care setting, with return to a state veterans home only after the acute condition had been resolved. However, in the 1990's, the VA embarked on a program of utilization management — consistent with community standards — to reduce unnecessary length of stay in the hospital, thereby better matching clinical needs to resources. This resulted in a greater portion of the transitional care of veterans being delivered in the state veterans homes.

Being good neighbors

Of the many state veterans homes, some are physically located on the grounds of a VA Medical Center (VAMC). This close physical proximity led naturally to clinical staff at many state veterans homes requesting access to the VA VistA and CPRS systems, which are used at all VA healthcare facilities across the country.

The primary business office responsible for overseeing any sharing arrangements with state veterans homes is the Geriatrics & Extended Care Strategic Healthcare Group (GEC-SHG). In 2002, this office convened a task force to formulate all necessary considerations in providing access to VistA and CPRS for selected staff at the State Veterans Homes. They determined that there would be a number of benefits both to the VA and the state veterans homes if secure access to patient data contained in these systems was granted. These benefits included improved patient care by both institutions; enhanced productivity by professionals at both institutions; and a reduction in administrative and healthcare delivery costs.

Two overarching alternatives were identified for sharing VistA and CPRS functionality and data with state veterans homes.

In the first alternative, state veterans homes could obtain the VistA and/or CPRS software from the VA and operate their own systems using state or contract technical staff. Under the second alternative, VA Medical Centers could grant State Veterans Homes with secure read-only access to patient data in the VistA and CPRS systems. The read-only option meant that state veterans homes' staff could not write entries into the VA medical record.

In January 2003, the Health Information Technology Sharing staff within the VHA Office of Information completed a more detailed analysis into the feasibility of providing VistA and/or CPRS Read Only access to the state veterans homes. Some of the other issues and major concerns surfaced by this study included: complying with various accreditation requirements, e.g. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and others; the need to build additional security features into CPRS to handle queries from an authorized external entity; and the need to address potential physician credentialing and privileging issues.

Survey says

Based on a survey of the state veterans homes completed in June 2003, there were eight states that expressed some interest in possibly acquiring and installing VistA for use as their own health information system. However, more than 90 percent of the states expressed a clear desire to have CPRS Read Only access only for a small number of key staff at their facilities. In addition, the survey found that approximately 30 state veterans homes had already been given CPRS Read Only access as a result of local sharing agreements.

Over a period of approximately 6 months, staff from the Offices of Information, General Counsel, Cyber Security, Geriatrics & Long Term Care, Medical Records Administration, and others helped to develop an implementation plan and detailed guidance needed to address these concerns.

The implementation plan recognized that providing VistA and/or CPRS Read Only access to staff at state veterans homes would allow front-line clinicians to provide better healthcare to our nation's veterans. A VHA Office of Information program manager was assigned to provide support to the Geriatrics & Long Term Care SHG in moving this national effort forward.

As of June 2005, the states that have completed obtaining CPRS Read Only access for their state veterans homes are listed below. There are more than 70 facilities in 20 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. Numerous sites in many other states are in the process of being connected. There are 128 state veterans homes in 47 states and more being opened.

All Homes W/ CPRS Read Only Access

Some Homes W/ CPRS Read Only Access

No Homes W/ CPRS Read Only Access

Alabama

Arizona

California

Connecticut

District of Columbia

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maryland

Missouri

North Carolina

Oklahoma

Oregon

Puerto Rico

Rhode Island

South Dakota

Utah

Vermont

West Virginia

Wyoming

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Montana

Nebraska

New York

Ohio

Pennsylvania

South Carolina

Texas

Washington

Wisconsin

Arkansas

Colorado

Illinois

Maine

Mississippi

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

North Dakota

Tennessee

Virginia

This collaborative initiative between the VA and state veterans homes has proven to be very successful. In fact, it is a model for others to follow when attempting to pursue federal and state government partnerships.

The VA was able to share its systems with the states and did not have to expend significant resources in doing so. The state veterans homes provided the funding and resources needed to implement and use the VA systems. The veterans who received healthcare treatment at both the VA and state facilities ended up being the real winners.

As a result of Oklahoma's successful acquisition and implementation of the VistA system for its own use, it is anticipated that several other states may choose to follow suit in the coming years. It is also expected that over time, those state veterans homes that have CPRS Read Only access may want to work with the VA on next steps to take to obtain the ability to place orders and have other interactive VistA and/or CPRS system capabilities.

Over the long term, whether the state veterans homes are using VistA or a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system, it is anticipated that they will one day want the ability to share or exchange information on patients receiving care at both the VA and the State Homes.

Christine Sheehy , R.N., Ph.D., is the director of quality for the INOVA HealthSystem nursing homes.

Peter Groen, M.P.A., is the director of the national Health IT Sharing program within the Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. He is also on the faculty of the Computer & Information Sciences Department at ShepherdUniversity in West Virginia.

Sponsored Recommendations

ASK THE EXPERT: ServiceNow’s Erin Smithouser on what C-suite healthcare executives need to know about artificial intelligence

Generative artificial intelligence, also known as GenAI, learns from vast amounts of existing data and large language models to help healthcare organizations improve hospital ...

TEST: Ask the Expert: Is Your Patients' Understanding Putting You at Risk?

Effective health literacy in healthcare is essential for ensuring informed consent, reducing medical malpractice risks, and enhancing patient-provider communication. Unfortunately...

From Strategy to Action: The Power of Enterprise Value-Based Care

Ever wonder why your meticulously planned value-based care model hasn't moved beyond the concept stage? You're not alone! Transition from theory to practice with enterprise value...

State of the Market: Transforming Healthcare; Strategies for Building a Resilient and Adaptive Workforce

The U.S. healthcare system is facing critical challenges, including workforce shortages, high turnover, and regulatory pressures. This guide highlights the vital role of technology...